Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch
From: Greg Lewis (glewis_at_eyesbeyond.com)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- In reply to: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Next in thread: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Reply: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:56:02 -0600 To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 02:41:32PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> What we would like to do is to move to a bsd-licensed version of
> patch, which I am supposed to be working on in my copious spare
> time...
OpenBSD appear to gotten permission from Larry Wall to put patch(1) under
a BSD license. They also appear to have made a reasonable number of
improvements since then, including better POSIX compliance. It may
be worth looking at :). I don't know what version of patch they started
with though.
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/patch/
-- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- In reply to: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Next in thread: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Reply: Garance A Drosihn: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Hellgate: London. What a fiasco.
... For what it's worth, I read on the forums now that the SP patch is out.
... to play the game so it really was a pleasant surprise. ... (comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action) - Re: What is Blizzard doing in my Addon Directory??
... > You can explain it, though, it's the patch, and it was in the patch notes. ...
The '.pub' files don't exactly resemble your average addon. ... > then they are using
Norton Personal Firewall too, rather than ZoneAlarm. ... >>it is worth hundereds
of euros/dollars. ... (alt.games.warcraft) - Re: Auto Assault beta mmog review
... You feel it's worth me doing another try registering? ... Personally, yes, I
feel the beta is worth a little effort to try and get ... I just couldn't stand another
700Mb patch. ... installer, which then downloads the rest of the game. ...
(comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.rpg) - Re: [PATCH] [RFC] brk randomization: compute RLIMIT_DATA properly (was Re: x86: randomize brk() and
... This patch is as I am not sure whether it is worth it (see Arjan's ...
you shouldn't be randomizing its breakage further with your patch. ... In cases of heap
area placed at randomly-generated offset from ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: VM patch acts up on network
... I'm not at all sure what you are seeing, but Microsoft has free support for ...
and that support may be worth trying: ... Some of the machines will not accept the
... > patch, even after upgrading Java with a previous patch. ... (microsoft.public.security)