Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch
From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih_at_rpi.edu)
Date: 07/30/04
- Previous message: Greg Lewis: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- In reply to: Greg Lewis: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Next in thread: Tim Robbins: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:18:07 -0400 To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
At 12:56 PM -0600 7/30/04, Greg Lewis wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 30, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> > What we would like to do is to move to a bsd-licensed version of
>> patch, which I am supposed to be working on in my copious spare
>> time...
>
>OpenBSD appear to gotten permission from Larry Wall to put patch(1)
>under a BSD license. They also appear to have made a reasonable
>number of improvements since then, including better POSIX compliance.
>It may be worth looking at :). I don't know what version of patch
>they started with though.
>
>http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/patch/
Indeed. Both NetBSD and OpenBSD have BSD-licensed versions of
patch. That's what I was supposed to start with. The thing is,
all three versions (Net, Open, Free) have different improvements
to them. I really should get going on this, but right now my
spare time is spent trying to track down other problems with my
FreeBSD machines...
-- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Greg Lewis: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- In reply to: Greg Lewis: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Next in thread: Tim Robbins: "Re: newer versions of gnu diff and patch"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- RE: [Full-Disclosure] Whos to blame for malicious code?
... The patch for Blaster came out 26 days prior to the ... Is *that* Microsoft's
fault ... Do those users not share at least *some* of the blame? ... The
point why I brought up OpenBSD is ... (Full-Disclosure) - Re: GSoC2007: cnst-sensors.2007-09-13.patch
... Second, since this patch is not only about the framework, but about some Super I/O
Hardware Monitoring drivers too, let me once again reiterate on the popularity of the chips that are
supported by the lmand itdrivers. ... On this 256th day of 2007, it is my great pleasure to announce
the completion of my GSoC2007 project on porting the sysctl hardware sensors framework from OpenBSD
to FreeBSD. ... sysctldocumentation for hardware sensors ... (freebsd-current) - Re: Compiling 2.5.1 on OpenBSD 4.1
... my patch would change these circumstances. ... I don't have OpenBSD available,
so I have to do all my research over ... int ttyname_r ... Defining _BSD_TYPES
brings it back. ... (comp.lang.python) - Re: Windows vulnerability vs Linux vulnerability [Re: Would a firewall
... each patch is something like 10-50 lines long. ... > would correspond with
several hundred of the OpenBSD patches. ... Can you imagine the average Windows user
applying a source patch? ... (comp.security.misc) - Re: taskqueue for pf periodic events
... The patch uses new taskqueue API made by Scott. ... is running SMP kernel on
a single CPU box with HTT (2 logical ... OpenBSD has by now done ... (freebsd-net)