Re: 4.x device failure?
From: Poul-Henning Kamp (phk_at_phk.freebsd.dk)
Date: 09/13/04
- Previous message: Sam: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- In reply to: Sam: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Sam <sah@softcardsystems.com> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:35:52 +0200
In message <Pine.LNX.4.60.0409131505220.6275@athena>, Sam writes:
>Ah. Well that answers it. I'll fail unloading of the
>module if devices are open.
>
>This leads to a curiosity as to how the RAID
>failover modules work at all. I guess if you abstract
>the real disk(s) under a logical disk you can change
>the bottom layer without affecting the top. I'll have
>to look at that code a little closer.
You should really start to study GEOM in 5.x which gives a nice
clean framework for all this sort of stuff.
You can start here for instance:
http://phk.freebsd.dk/pubs/bsdcan-04.slides.geomtut.pdf
-- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Sam: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- In reply to: Sam: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: 4.x device failure?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|