Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

From: Hajimu UMEMOTO (ume_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/21/04

  • Next message: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
    Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:09:11 +0900
    To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
    
    

    Hi,

    >>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
    >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said:

    brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
    brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
    brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
    brooks> best approach.

    I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.

    Sincerely,

    --
    Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
    ume@mahoroba.org  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
    http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-arch)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually ... Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually ... Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, ...
      (freebsd-hackers)