Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
From: Hajimu UMEMOTO (ume_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/21/04
- Previous message: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:09:11 +0900 To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Hi,
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
>>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said:
brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
brooks> best approach.
I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Next in thread: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|