Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?

From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 09/21/04

  • Next message: Stephan Uphoff: "Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions" 
    Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:15:39 -0700
To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@FreeBSD.org>

    On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 02:09:11AM +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > >>>>> On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:14:20 -0700
    > >>>>> Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> said:
    >
    > brooks> The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a
    > brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually
    > brooks> work with. A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the
    > brooks> best approach.
    >
    > I believe KAME doesn't use non standard struct such as sock_union.

    Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME.

    -- Brooks 

    -- 
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

    • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
  • Next message: Stephan Uphoff: "Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually ... > brooks> work with. ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ... Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME. ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > brooks> general name when it isn't and such a type would be hell to actually ... > brooks> work with. ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ... Oops, you are correct, it's part of fastipsec, not KAME. ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-hackers)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-net)
    • Re: Global (non _KERNEL) place for sockaddr_union?
      ... > I think Brooks' recommendation is sound and should probably be followed ... > as it's fairly close to my original recommendation to you in private. ... The real problem may be that KAME mistakenly gave sockaddr_union a ... A custom union that does exactly what pf needs may be the ...
      (freebsd-arch)