Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
From: Brooks Davis (brooks_at_one-eyed-alien.net)
Date: 10/20/04
- Previous message: jamie rishaw at google mail: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: jamie rishaw at google mail: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 08:19:10 -0700 To: jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:16:56AM -0500, jamie rishaw at google mail wrote:
> What are the performance implications of a debug kernel?
None what so ever. The debugging bits are not loaded in to memory.
-- Brooks
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: jamie rishaw at google mail: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: jamie rishaw at google mail: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|