Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]

From: Scott Long (scottl_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/20/04

  • Next message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
    Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:45:15 -0600
    To: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
    
    

    Ceri Davies wrote:
    > On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 10:25:56AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
    >
    >>jamie rishaw at google mail wrote:
    >>
    >>>What are the performance implications of a debug kernel?
    >>>
    >>>Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down
    >>>to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for
    >>>sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any
    >>>significant performance hits..
    >>
    >>Disk space on the release CD images is at a premium, and putting debug
    >>kernels on there generally consumes 10-15MB that could be used by
    >>packages.
    >
    >
    > Would you consider this something that we could run with in
    > CURRENT/STABLE and just turn off for releases?
    >
    > Ceri
    > --

    That's already the case for HEAD. I have no opinion on 4-STABLE and
    5-STABLE. The only problem might be that while disk space is cheap,
    the root partition is often fairly small and of course fixed in size
    and un-growable. 256MB might get really tight if you start installing
    multiple debug kernels. Also, 4.x uses 128MB for root, IIRC, which
    leaves even less wiggle room. It's fine to mandate that the root
    partitions shall be bigger in the future to accomodate this, but for
    those that are doing source upgrades from older systems, they might
    be in for a shock when 1/3 of their root partition gets consumed by a
    kernel.

    Scott
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
      ... Ceri Davies wrote: ... The only problem might be that while disk space is cheap, ... the root partition is often fairly small and of course fixed in size ... multiple debug kernels. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: [opensuse] Running slow, / full
      ... > is reported as having no free space. ... Don't screw with that -- it takes NO disk space ... ... witnessed tuning the kernel parameters of a running ... and your personal files have filled up the root partition. ...
      (SuSE)
    • Re: 6Gb of invisible files, or what?
      ... Juha Pahkala wrote: ... > install debian unstable from scratch. ... > root partition was quite full, I'd double the size to 10Gb so I ... > Can anybody help me here, to free up some disk space, to help me ...
      (Debian-User)
    • 6Gb of invisible files, or what?
      ... it had an old mail server address...but the ... root partition was quite full, I'd double the size to 10Gb so I wouldn't ... have problems with that anymore. ... Can anybody help me here, to free up some disk space, to help me ...
      (Debian-User)
    • 6Gb of invisible files, or what?
      ... install debian unstable from scratch. ... root partition was quite full, I'd double the size to 10Gb so I wouldn't ... have problems with that anymore. ... Can anybody help me here, to free up some disk space, to help me ...
      (Debian-User)