Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]

From: M. Warner Losh (imp_at_bsdimp.com)
Date: 10/20/04

  • Next message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
    Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:52:59 -0600 (MDT)
    To: wb@freebie.xs4all.nl
    
    

    In message: <20041020154026.GA40554@freebie.xs4all.nl>
                Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> writes:
    : On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote..
    : > In message: <6ff30abd04102008163115a32d@mail.gmail.com>
    : > jamie rishaw at google mail <mitigator@gmail.com> writes:
    : > : What are the performance implications of a debug kernel?
    : > :
    : > : Disk space really shouldnt even be an issue.. if it is, and its down
    : > : to the difference of 20 megs, well, duno. 512 meg CF's going for
    : > : sub-$50 .. the only reason i could see even a debate would be any
    : > : significant performance hits..
    : >
    : > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much.
    : >
    : > However, I'm going going to take exception that it isn't a disk space
    :
    : Sure.. and we have plenty of Viagra spam to prove it ;-)
    :
    : > starting to fill up. In addition, we sometimes deploy new kernels to
    : > the field and 16MB takes a lot longer to upload than 3MB (think really
    : > bad connectivity to many of the remote locations our systems may be
    : > deployed in).
    :
    : But I assume you would run a customised kernel on these machines anyway?

    Yes. Please see the first sentence of my reply:

    : > So long as it can be turned off, I don't care too much.

    Size does matter, so I have to be able to turn this feature off.

    Warner
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


  • Next message: M. Warner Losh: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: RFC: Starting a stable kernel series off the 2.6 kernel
      ... > These folks have nothing new to innovate here. ... > module compatibility busted every rev of the kernel. ... But not about the same thing you care about. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH 00/30] C/R OpenVZ/Virtuozzo style
      ... See the thread on creating tasks in userspace vs. kernel space: ... "process genuinely doesn't care about routing table of netns it lives in" ... In this scheme, if user wants to checkpoint just one process, he should ... start it alone in separate container. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: [PATCH 3/3] Time to make CONFIG_PARAVIRT non-experimental.
      ... Those most likely to care can turn it off. ... I generally try to stick with the distro kernel when possible, ... Actually if I understand the functionality of paravirt correctly that is ... Besides it's bad taste and taste is very important. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Kernel header files in applications and GPL issues
      ... If _ALL_ you care about is the kernel then you ... Anyway you don't have to release your code _solely_ as a link kit. ... All code in the Linux kernel is released under the same base license ... under a modified BSD license or whatever), but all the code gives _at ...
      (comp.os.linux.development.apps)
    • [opensuse] Re: A BIG "show stopper" for openSUSE at the corporate level anyway!!
      ... I've seen OAS systems that care about file types or allow ... says "my business is more important than the users". ... "being protected" means for them that they can download and run ... kernel devs to work on and create a more stable kernel, ...
      (SuSE)