Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
From: Max Laier (max_at_love2party.net)
Date: 10/20/04
- Previous message: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: Sam: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Sam: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:13:35 +0200
Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implement
it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with
this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on.
I don't see the point in exchanging details on how cheap or expensive disk
space or admin time is these days.
-- /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: Giorgos Keramidas: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: Sam: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Sam: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]