Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
From: Scott Long (scottl_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/20/04
- Previous message: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Julian Elischer: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:39:53 -0600 To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 08:20:48PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>
>>Let me clarify it down: it is only applies to HEAD, that is, unstable
>>branch, which can be inheretedly buggy. STABLE/RELEASE doesn't really
>>need this feature. This dismisses the following objections:
>
>
> I think it's more important in HEAD, but personally I would like to ship
> this way. It has the potential to vastly improve the quality of bug
> reports. That's not my call though.
>
>
>>1. HDD size constrains: nobody really want to run unpatched HEAD on CF
>>or the like, since with HEAD you are expected to re-compile more than often.
>>
>>2. / partition size: anybody running HEAD is expected to allow this
>>accomodate debugging kernel.
>>
>>3. Additional slowdown: since it is adds up to 10 seconds (I bet that
>>even less on a modern system) who cares? This is HEAD, so that it is
>>expected to be sub-optimal performance-wise.
>
>
> I seriously doubt it's measurable. If it is, the loader is broken. :-)
> We're talking about reading a section header and doing a seek for each
> ELF section we don't care about (all the ones that bloat the file
> relative to the stripped version.)
>
> -- Brooks
Actually, another possbility would be to have the kernel install target
install the stripped kernel into /boot/kernel/kernel and the debug
kernel into /var/kernel/kernel.debug or some similar location.
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Next in thread: Julian Elischer: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Julian Elischer: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Reply: Brooks Davis: "Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
... This is HEAD, so that it is ... another possbility would be to have the kernel
install target ... install the stripped kernel into /boot/kernel/kernel and the debug
... (freebsd-current) - Re: [RFC] enhancing the kernels graphics subsystem
... >>> Linux graphics world and avoid the situation we have now where several
... >>> kernel and userspace drivers compete for control of graphics devices.
... >> The original model for this was to give each head its own fbdev device. ...
> thing, you have crtcs and outputs, no heads. ... (Linux-Kernel) - Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
... nobody really want to run unpatched HEAD on CF ... accomodate debugging kernel.
... But the debug info isn't actually loaded into memory so ... >>What I'm
thinking of doing is having the installkernel target install the ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?]
... nobody really want to run unpatched HEAD on CF ... accomodate debugging kernel.
... But the debug info isn't actually loaded into memory so ... >>What I'm
thinking of doing is having the installkernel target install the ... (freebsd-current) - Re: When will the new BCE driver in HEAD be incorporated into RELENG_6?
... In response to Bill Moran: ... Using the driver from HEAD* in the latest
RELENG_6 didn't fix our ... and rebuilt the kernel. ... I was able to trigger the
watchdog timeout in less than 5 minutes. ... (freebsd-stable)