Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
From: Andre Oppermann (andre_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/21/04
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Matt Emmerton: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Matt Emmerton: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Marco Molteni: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:22:54 +0200 To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org>
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide
> > a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
>
> I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on working
> on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would
> be a good starting point.
Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? Are there any other (open source)
implementations of it?
It's my time and I'll do the T/TCP replacement in any case because I think
it is useful. :)
-- Andre _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Matt Emmerton: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Matt Emmerton: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Marco Molteni: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... > I disagree. ... I think the time spent here would be better spent
on working ... > on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would
... Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? ... (freebsd-net) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I think the time spent here would be better spent on working ... >> on
an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would ... > Is the SCTP
in KAME complete and stable? ... The SCTP home page has a list of implementations. ...
(freebsd-arch) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I think the time spent here would be better spent on working ... >> on
an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would ... > Is the SCTP
in KAME complete and stable? ... The SCTP home page has a list of implementations. ...
(freebsd-net) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I think the time spent here would be better spent on ... > Is the SCTP
in KAME complete and stable? ... for Linux, plus other user-level implementations.
... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I think the time spent here would be better spent on ... > Is the SCTP
in KAME complete and stable? ... for Linux, plus other user-level implementations.
... (freebsd-net)