Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 10/21/04
- Previous message: Mark Allman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:51:37 -0700 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I intend to remove T/TCP (transactional TCP) support from our TCP
> implementation for the following reasons:
..
Fine.
> Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide
> a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
..
> This different implementation will be disabled by default and clearly
> marked EXPERIMENTAL in a protocol sense. It will allow the only known
> user of T/TCP to keep the same functionality with a very small change
> to his application. It allows interesting new uses primarily in
> Intranet environment where many short connections are openend in rapid
> succession (LDAP servers, SQL servers, etc.). The modifications to
> those programs to use the new option is minimal and requires only the
> setting of the socket option, one setsockopt() call.
I'm not so happy with a FreeBSD-only "proprietary" thing. Is there any
proposed RFC work that provides the qualities you want? The advantage
with T/TCP is that there was a published standard.
-- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Mark Allman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Garrett Wollman: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... > I intend to remove T/TCP (transactional TCP) support from our TCP ... >
Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide ... > setting
of the socket option, ... (freebsd-net) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... > I intend to remove T/TCP support from our TCP ... Good reasons &
decision Andre. ... Another reason is that T/TCP is listed as "deprecated" in the
... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... > I intend to remove T/TCP support from our TCP ... Good reasons &
decision Andre. ... Another reason is that T/TCP is listed as "deprecated" in the
... (freebsd-net) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... >I want to bring this up for discussion prior to start working on it. ...
>I intend to remove T/TCP (transactional TCP) support from our TCP ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... >I want to bring this up for discussion prior to start working on it. ...
>I intend to remove T/TCP (transactional TCP) support from our TCP ... (freebsd-net)