Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
From: Julian Elischer (julian_at_elischer.org)
Date: 10/21/04
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:58:58 -0700 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Andre Oppermann wrote:
>Mark Allman wrote:
>
>
>>>Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide
>>>a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
>>>
>>>
>>I haven't fully digested this yet. But, I'll voice my distaste for
>>implementing things that just seem to "Make Sense". That's a model that
>>has been used and is used by other operating systems and those of us who
>>watch packets can attest that things that "Make Sense" often don't and
>>likely would have benefitted by a bit more thought and a bit more
>>vetting. I would be happier if something like this were vetted out a
>>bit more (written up, digested by folks, etc.) before it went into
>>anything but someone's experimental kernel. Just my two cents.
>>
>>
>
>Sure. To make you sleep better it will be disabled by default (like
>T/TCP) and possibly even not compliled in by default (#ifdef'd). If
>enabled and compiled in it does not automatically enable itself for all
>and everything. The application has to enable it on the socket as well.
>
>A writeup will follow once I get there. I made this request before I
>start working on it to prevent to waste my time on it if people wanted
>to religiously stick to T/TCP.
>
>
couldn't you do it with a spoofing interface?
i.e. tcp sessions going through get turned into something that loks like
ttcp
on the wire and converted back at teh other end?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I'll voice my distaste for ... >>has been used and is used by other
operating systems and those of us who ... >to religiously stick to T/TCP. ...
(freebsd-net) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I'll voice my distaste for ... > has been used and is used by other
operating systems and those of us who ... T/TCP) and possibly even not compliled
in by default. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
... I'll voice my distaste for ... > has been used and is used by other
operating systems and those of us who ... T/TCP) and possibly even not compliled
in by default. ... (freebsd-net)