Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
From: Garrett Wollman (wollman_at_khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu)
Date: 10/21/04
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: David O'Brien: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:01:56 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
<<On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:51:37 -0700, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> said:
> I'm not so happy with a FreeBSD-only "proprietary" thing. Is there any
> proposed RFC work that provides the qualities you want? The advantage
> with T/TCP is that there was a published standard.
T/TCP was a published *non*standard, loudly blazoned "EXPERIMENTAL".
I don't see how Andre's proposed replacement can be any worse.
-GAWollman
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Julian Elischer: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: David O'Brien: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]