Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler
From: Julian Elischer (julian_at_elischer.org)
Date: 10/22/04
- Previous message: Russell L. Carter: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Craig Rodrigues: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: SUZUKI Shinsuke: "SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:24:57 -0700 To: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 09:32:48PM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
>>A T/TCP alternative as you are describing sounds very
>>similar to PR-SCTP (Partial Reliability SCTP). (Don't let the
>>name fool you, please read the internet draft).
>
>
> Interesting stuff:
> http://www.portaroo.net/ietf/idref/draft-ietf-tsvwg-prsctp/
that's potaroo
>
>
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Russell L. Carter: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- In reply to: Craig Rodrigues: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Next in thread: SUZUKI Shinsuke: "SCTP in KAME / Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|