Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler

From: Randall Stewart (randall_at_stewart.chicago.il.us)
Date: 10/23/04

  • Next message: Randall Stewart: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler" 
    Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:16:04 -0400
To: Marco Molteni <molter@tin.it>

    Marco Molteni wrote:
    > On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Bruce M Simpson wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to
    >>>>provide a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality:
    >>>
    >>>I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on
    >>>working on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code
    >>>base would be a good starting point.
    >>
    >>Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? Are there any other (open
    >>source) implementations of it?
    >
    >
    > SCTP in KAME is complete, stable and fully supported.
    > It is mainly developed by the SCTP RFC author, Randall Stewart.
    >
    > A T/TCP alternative as you are describing sounds very
    > similar to PR-SCTP (Partial Reliability SCTP). (Don't let the
    > name fool you, please read the internet draft).

    RFC3758 (its a proposed standard now.. not a draft.) :->

    R

    > There is at least another kernel-level open source implementation,
    > for Linux, plus other user-level implementations.
    >
    > marco 

    -- 
Randall Stewart
803-345-0369 <or> 815-342-5222(cell)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Randall Stewart: "Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler"

    Relevant Pages