Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs...
From: Kris Kennaway (kris_at_obsecurity.org)
Date: 12/22/04
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- Next in thread: Jilles Tjoelker: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:34:41 -0800 To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 12:25:35AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20041221232354.GA28374@xor.obsecurity.org>, Kris Kennaway writes:
> >
> >--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> >Content-Disposition: inline
> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:32:34PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> >
> >> >Either disable forceful unmount of devfs, which makes sense from
> >> >KISS and many other principles, and then jail wardens will have to
> >> >find other ways to clean up their jails
> >
> >> >The more I think about it, the more I lean towards the first option.
> >> >
> >>=20
> >> I think that I'd agree here from the point of view of finding an=20
> >> expedient way to keep from shooting off feet.
> >
> >Unfortunately that's going to cause me a fair amount of pain, unless
> >there's a simple way to kill all processes running in a given chroot
> >(NB: I don't currently use jails because a number of ports won't build
> >in a jail) so I can free up the devfs and then unmount it.
>
> But unmounting it forcefully is not guaranteed to clean up your
> chroot today...
Well, at least the filesystem presence disappears so I can reuse the
mountpoint.
Kris
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- In reply to: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- Next in thread: Jilles Tjoelker: "Re: Forcefully unmounting devfs..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|