Re: c99/c++ localised variable definition

From: Garance A Drosihn (drosih_at_rpi.edu)
Date: 02/02/05

  • Next message: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: c99/c++ localised variable definition" 
    Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2005 01:24:59 -0500
To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk>, arch@freebsd.org

    At 11:46 PM +0000 2/1/05, Paul Richards wrote:
    >
    >Surely the issue should be, if you're a good coder and you adhere
    >to the adopted style, which style is more likely to result in
    >maintainable code.

    I suspect that if you're a good coder, or if you have a bunch of
    good coders looking over your shoulder (like we do here...), then
    the current style is just as likely to result in good, maintainable
    code as the localized-variable style that you are proposing. Thus,
    there does not seem to be any compelling reason to change the style.

    Just MO, of course. 

    -- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: John-Mark Gurney: "Re: c99/c++ localised variable definition"