Re: Freeing vnodes.

From: Don Lewis (truckman_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 03/16/05

  • Next message: Peter Jeremy: "Re: Freeing vnodes." 
    Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:33:04 -0800 (PST)
To: jroberson@chesapeake.net

    On 15 Mar, Jeff Roberson wrote:
    > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Matthew Dillon wrote:

    >> syncer: I've always wanted to rewrite the syncer to be per-mount
    >> or per-physical-device so it could sync out to multiple
    >> physical devices simultaniously.

    It would be nice to do this on a per-physical-device basis to avoid
    multiple threads contending for the same device, but this looks like it
    would be difficult due to the way that devices can be sliced, diced, and
    merged.

    It would also be nice if buf_daemon was a per-device or per-mount. I
    haven't tested it lately, but in the past I was able to deadlock
    buf_daemon by loopback NFS mounting a local file system and doing a lot
    of write activity (iozone works well for this).

    > The syncer is kind of bogus anyway, because it mostly just destroys the
    > buf daemon's delayed writes by forcing it all out at once. It does
    > redundant work, except for updating inodes, which should be all it really
    > does.

    The syncer also sets an upper bound on the time that file modifications
    go unwritten to disk. Buf_daemon sleeps while numdirtybuffers <=
    lodirtybuffers, so a file updated on a quiet system would not be written
    to disk for an arbitrarily long time without the syncer.

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Peter Jeremy: "Re: Freeing vnodes."