Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?
From: Doug Barton (dougb_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 03/22/05
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:28:37 -0800 To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
John Baldwin wrote:
> I agree in that I think BIND is good to have in the tree. I think it should
> just default to install everything. Folks who don't want certain things can
> always prune them out later. Having the server installed can be useful for
> being able to run a local caching nameserver at conferences when the hotel
> DNS is horrible (Boston ATC last year) even if you don't run it all the
> time. :) Also, the release process will be a lot simpler if it just installs
> everything by default.
As far as I can see, this comment from John (and the similar one from
Robert) represent the consensus viewpoint. I will therefore drop this as an
action item unless someone makes a very convincing case to change the
current defaults.
Thanks to everyone who offered their opinions and support on this topic.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Re: Time to stop buildling named (and friends) by default in 6-current?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|