De-orbitting ATM-HARP
From: Harti Brandt (hartmut.brandt_at_dlr.de)
Date: 04/15/05
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: HEADS-UP: Planning on deprecating libc_r for 6.0"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 17:41:57 +0200 (CEST) To: arch@freebsd.org
Hi all,
not sure whether this is actually off-topic. Some time ago I asked on
freebsd-atm who would have a problem when we remove HARP (netatm, hfa)
from 6. I got only two or three answers which said 'go for it'. Nobody
said that he would have a problem. So should we do it and when? Perhaps
the best time is before 6.0. That would be in the next two weeks as I
understand.
While there I would also remove everything from netnatm that is not needed
by NgATM. This is mainly the socket interface. I'm not aware of any
application that uses it. Any thoughts on this?
harti
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Dan Nelson: "Re: HEADS-UP: Planning on deprecating libc_r for 6.0"
- Next in thread: Andre Oppermann: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Andre Oppermann: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Reply: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: De-orbitting ATM-HARP"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]