AMD64 NUMA-awareness?
From: Jung-uk Kim (jkim_at_niksun.com)
Date: 05/19/05
- Previous message: Maxim Sobolev: "Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 14:31:08 -0400
ULE scheduler paper
(http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/bsdcon03/tech/roberson.html)
says:
'SMT introduces a concept of non-uniform processors into ULE which
could be extended to support NUMA. The concept of expressing the
penalty for migration through the use of separate queues could be
further developed to include a local and global load-balancing
policy. At the time of this writing, however, FreeBSD does not
support any true NUMA capable machines and so this is left until such
time that it does.'
I am not sure about the meaning of 'true NUMA capable machines' but
AMD64 is ccNUMA unless I am completely mistaken, and FreeBSD/amd64 is
well-supported. Even multicore processors are available now and
Intel is going to release dual-core processors with HTT to make
matters worse.
Is there anybody working on this?
Thanks,
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Maxim Sobolev: "Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time"
- Next in thread: Scott Long: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Reply: Scott Long: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Reply: David O'Brien: "Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]