Re: AMD64 NUMA-awareness?

From: David O'Brien (obrien_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 05/23/05

  • Next message: Sergey Babkin: "Re: Re: Scheduler fixes for hyperthreading" 
    Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 22:22:11 -0700
To: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com>

    On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 02:31:08PM -0400, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
    > I am not sure about the meaning of 'true NUMA capable machines' but
    > AMD64 is ccNUMA unless I am completely mistaken, and FreeBSD/amd64 is
    > well-supported. Even multicore processors are available now
    ..snip..

    I am working on extracting the CPU & memory topology on AMD Opteron
    machines. For Athlon64 X2 (dual-core) there is nothing for FreeBSD to do
    differently than today.

    Once I have the ability to nicely express the topology on an Opteron
    system, there are two heavy hitters that have said they will consume the
    bits and work on optimizing FreeBSD for Opteron systems.

    For Intel dual-core HTT systems, there aren't any NUMA characteristics
    I'm aware of. 

    -- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Sergey Babkin: "Re: Re: Scheduler fixes for hyperthreading"