Re: Re: Scheduler fixes for hyperthreading

From: Sergey Babkin (babkin_at_verizon.net)
Date: 05/23/05

  • Next message: Harti Brandt: "Handling of shell builtins in make(1)" 
    Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 07:08:55 -0500 (CDT)
To: Stephan Uphoff <ups@tree.com>, Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org>

    >> > Beside benchmarking - is there any other real use for RDTSC ?
    >>
    >> Some (broken) software uses the TSC in combination with external events in
    >> order to obtain entropy for cryptographic key generation. As a result,
    >> disabling RDTSC could lead to non-obvious but very problematic breakage.
    >
    >Both bde and phk seem to agree with you that just disabling RDTSC is not
    >an option :-(

    RDTSC is very useful for profiling. So given a choice
    for disabling RDTSC or disabling hyperthreading
    personally I'd have no doubts that disabling
    hyperthreading wins.

    So far I've seen no use for hyperthreading whatsoever.
    If anything, it seems to make the machine slower
    due to I think extra contention for memory/cache, and
    probably due to the extra scheduling overhead.
    So I just get it disabled in the BIOS.
    Maybe I've just haven't seen the "right" kind of
    applications.

    -SB
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Harti Brandt: "Handling of shell builtins in make(1)"

    Relevant Pages