Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h
From: Doug Rabson (dfr_at_nlsystems.com)
Date: 05/26/05
- Previous message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- In reply to: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- Next in thread: Doug Rabson: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 09:33:47 +0100
On Wednesday 25 May 2005 18:40, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On May 25, 2005, at 10:19 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > Short answer:
> >
> > Great idea.
>
> Seconded.
Thirded.
>
> > Longer, more detailed answer.
> >
> > The original idea was to provide a hint to busspace that this
> > driver only ever used a certain subset of the available mappings so
> > it should assume that subset and agressively optimize the code.
>
> It has also worked against, well, me in the past in that I couldn't
> figure out why a driver simply didn't want to work with memio while
> it worked perfectly with pio. Then I spotted the bus_pio.h header at
> the top and cursed, cursed, cursed.
>
> I'm all for performance tuning, but the newbus optimization is just
> too weird for its own good this way.
Hey, don't blame this on newbus - it predates newbus by quite a bit. I
seem to remember that this came in with the first import of CAM so you
can blame Justin :-)
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- In reply to: Marcel Moolenaar: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- Next in thread: Doug Rabson: "Re: [RFC] remove bus_memio.h and bus_pio.h"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|