Re: Modifying file access time upon exec...
From: Marc Olzheim (marcolz_at_stack.nl)
Date: 05/27/05
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:17:50 +0200 To: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU>
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 04:24:25PM -0400, Ken Smith wrote:
> Any thoughts before I commit it? The patch itself is pretty small. But
> given the sections of code it's mucking with combined with it adding a
> little 'nit' filesystem implementers should be aware of I wanted to run
> it by as many clueful eyes as possible before doing the final commit.
Has this been run through some kind of real world performance test ? I
can imagine for instance /bin/sh's vnode is being updated a lot... Would
it be eligible to a becoming a mount option ?
I don't see any real problems with it, but perhaps people running
executables over NFS filesystems that cannot be mounted with noatime
might have an issue, like netbooting diskless machines...
Marc
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Ken Smith: "Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- In reply to: Ken Smith: "Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Next in thread: Ken Smith: "Re: Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Reply: Ken Smith: "Re: Modifying file access time upon exec..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]