Re: [PATCH] Stackgap

From: Robert Watson (ratson_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 05/28/05

  • Next message: Daniel Eriksson: "MPSAFE CAM? (was: RE: Remaining system calls to make MPSAFE -- NTP, VFS, AIO, linux/etc)" 
    Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 15:10:12 +0100 (BST)
To: Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@FreeBSD.org>

    On Fri, 27 May 2005, Suleiman Souhlal wrote:

    > You can find an implementation of stackgap from OpenBSD at http://
    > people.freebsd.org/~ssouhlal/testing/stackgap-20050527.diff
    >
    > You can control the range of the random stack gap with the
    > kern.stackgap_random sysctl. A value of 0 disables it. Otherwise, it has
    > to be a power of 2 and not too large. The default value is 64K.
    >
    > I've only had the chance to test this on i386. Could anyone test it on
    > other architectures as well?
    >
    > Any comments/objections?

    In the past, substantial performance hits have been measured due to poor
    stack alignment. Specifically, in combination with less optimal compiler
    behavior, the results have been pretty nasty. Have you tried
    micro-benchmarking a series of runs with this stack offset randomness
    using floating point on stack arguments to see if there's a measurable
    cost to moving the stack around? Hopefull if all is well, there will be
    little or no difference, but a small error here could result in a
    substantial performance hit...

    Robert N M Watson
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

  • Next message: Daniel Eriksson: "MPSAFE CAM? (was: RE: Remaining system calls to make MPSAFE -- NTP, VFS, AIO, linux/etc)"