Re: Death to toor
From: Xin LI (delphij_at_frontfree.net)
Date: 06/10/05
- Previous message: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Death to toor"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Death to toor"
- Next in thread: Ceri Davies: "Re: Death to toor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 17:13:51 +0800
在 2005-06-09四的 16:40 -0700,John Baldwin写道:
> Is there any good reason to keep the toor account around nowadays?
> vipw has existed since 4.0BSD and chsh and friends have existed since
> 4.3BSD-Reno so I think that it's safe to say that folks are more than
> capable nowadays of changing root's default shell if desired. Also,
> '/bin/csh' and '/bin/sh' aren't very hard to type once you are logged
> in as root whatever the default shell may be.
Seconded.
Cheers,
-- Xin LI <delphij delphij net> http://www.delphij.net/
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Eivind Eklund: "Re: Death to toor"
- In reply to: John Baldwin: "Death to toor"
- Next in thread: Ceri Davies: "Re: Death to toor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
- Re: Death to toor
... > vipw has existed since 4.0BSD and chsh and friends have existed since ...
> capable nowadays of changing root's default shell if desired. ... (freebsd-arch) - Death to toor
... Is there any good reason to keep the toor account around nowadays? ... vipw
has existed since 4.0BSD and chsh and friends have existed since ... capable nowadays
of changing root's default shell if desired. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Death to toor
... > vipw has existed since 4.0BSD and chsh and friends have existed since ...
> capable nowadays of changing root's default shell if desired. ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: Death to toor
... > capable nowadays of changing root's default shell if desired. ... I wouldn't
say we are totally safe changing root's default shell away ... (freebsd-arch) - Re: working with paths
... Note that that shebang line generally doesn't get you a Bourne ... shell,
nowadays, it gives you a POSIX sh. ... You don't need to export IFS, ... Bourne
shell behaves differently from nowadays standard shs. ... (comp.unix.shell)