mach microkernel
From: DANIEL hoggan (danny280279_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/29/05
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: Gateway ALR 9200"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: mach microkernel"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: mach microkernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:33:43 +0000
I am using mach4 as my os for my project i just wanted to know, if mach uses
a lot of bsd code to emulate unix funcionality, then would porting bsd code
be a simple case of just dropping it in, or does it actually require some
rewrite, i mean according to the mach4 page netbsd is capbable of just
dropping in mach4 microkernel:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/flux/mach4/html/projects.html
Easy-to-install Mach distribution: In order to attract more people from the
Linux/BSD crowd, we really need someone to put together an easy-to-install
Mach+Lites or (when it's mature enough) Mach+Hurd binary distribution. This
distribution might be just an add-on supplement to an existing
monolithic-kernel distribution, or it could be an entirely separate
distribution with a whole new set of binaries. Of course, a simple add-on to
an existing distribution is likely to be simpler and more popular, so we
should try to go with that approach if at all possible. (Mach+Lites on the
i386 is already pretty close to being a drop-in NetBSD kernel replacement.)
_________________________________________________________________
Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar now!
http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: John Baldwin: "Re: Gateway ALR 9200"
- Next in thread: Robert Watson: "Re: mach microkernel"
- Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: mach microkernel"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]