Re: in.c autoadding prefix route
From: Ulrich Spoerlein (q_at_uni.de)
Date: 11/11/04
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Maybe in reply to: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 22:29:20 +0100 To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net>
On Thu, 11.11.2004 at 21:24:05 +0100, Max Laier wrote:
> The patch allows to add more than on IPv4 address with the same prefix. In the
> case that there is a route already, we leave it alone and add the new address
> without the IFA_ROUTE flag. When we remove an address later on, that has a
> route associated, we try to find an alternative address to use for the route
> and hand it over.
Assume I have two computers hooked up via Ethernet and via Firewire
(if_fwe). Will this commit allow me to place all four IP addresses of
the interfaces into the same subnet and have FreeBSD re-route the
packets through Firewire if the Ethernet link goes down (or vice versa)?
Or do I need to go CARP for this to work?
Ulrich Spoerlein
-- PGP Key ID: F0DB9F44 Encrypted mail welcome! Fingerprint: F1CE D062 0CA9 ADE3 349B 2FE8 980A C6B5 F0DB 9F44 Ok, which part of "Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn." didn't you understand?
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Maybe in reply to: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Reply: Max Laier: "Re: in.c autoadding prefix route"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|