Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap
From: Colin Percival (cperciva_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 08/07/05
- Previous message: Colin Percival: "Re: Adding portsnap to the base system"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 10:30:47 -0700 To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <42F63113.5020600@freebsd.org>
> Colin Percival <cperciva@freebsd.org> writes:
> : Huh? Isn't the ports tree BSD-licensed?
>
> I keep seeing snapshots and build. I still don't know if this
> distributes sources or binaries. My concern was if it distributed
> binaries.
Portsnap distributes the ports tree. The word "build" in the context
of portsnap refers to the process of taking the ports tree, generating
"raw" describes files (from which INDEX files are later "cooked" at
the client side), and squishing everything into the various-sized boxes
which constitute the format in which portsnap distributes everything.
Colin Percival
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Colin Percival: "Re: Adding portsnap to the base system"
- In reply to: M. Warner Losh: "Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap"
- Next in thread: Colin Percival: "Re: /usr/portsnap vs. /var/db/portsnap"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]