Re: fdesc allocation optimization
From: Devon H. O'Dell (dodell_at_offmyserver.com)
Date: 08/22/05
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- Next in thread: Matthew Dillon: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:27:01 -0700 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 04:20:05PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> >
> > Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> writes:
> > > When did you commit this? Is it only in post 5.0 releases?
> >
> > Early 2004, before RELENG_5 was branched.
>
> That explains why DFBSD didn't have it. So we are better off in
> anything >5.x despite the uninformed comments on the DFBSD lists.
>
> --
> Andre
I think that they actually did a good bit of research into all
of the fdalloc implementations in the BSDs before choosing
their path. Perhaps misunderstood is a more accurate word than
uninformed.
--Devon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Andre Oppermann: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- Next in thread: Matthew Dillon: "Re: fdesc allocation optimization"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]