Bigger boot block size?

From: Jung-uk Kim (jkim_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/08/05

  • Next message: Peter Wemm: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
    To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
    Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 14:18:44 -0400
    
    
    

    I have been working on boot2 recently. I faced constant problem with
    boot2 size limitation. Can we have bigger boot block size (aka
    BBSIZE)? In the future, we may have to support different file system
    to boot from and we won't have any space to add the support without
    dropping UFS1 support. In fact, I am using 32-sector boot block and
    I don't see any problem so far. The patch that I've been using is
    attached.

    Cheers,

    Jung-uk Kim

    
    
    

    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



  • Next message: Peter Wemm: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Superblock doesnt seem to be after boot block.
      ... 1024 bytes after the boot block all I read in are null bytes. ... The first sector has a single partition table entry at offset 0x1be. ... Will your tools support FUSE? ... FUSE support gains nice NetBSD and Linux ...
      (comp.os.minix)
    • Re: Superblock doesnt seem to be after boot block.
      ... 1024 bytes after the boot block all I read in are null bytes. ... These cards and other removable flash memory cards I ... Will your tools support FUSE? ...
      (comp.os.minix)