Re: Bigger boot block size?
From: Peter Wemm (peter_at_wemm.org)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: Jung-uk Kim: "Bigger boot block size?"
- In reply to: Jung-uk Kim: "Bigger boot block size?"
- Next in thread: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Reply: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 16:52:56 -0700
On Thursday 08 September 2005 11:18 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> I have been working on boot2 recently. I faced constant problem with
> boot2 size limitation. Can we have bigger boot block size (aka
> BBSIZE)? In the future, we may have to support different file system
> to boot from and we won't have any space to add the support without
> dropping UFS1 support. In fact, I am using 32-sector boot block and
> I don't see any problem so far. The patch that I've been using is
> attached.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jung-uk Kim
Well, the obvious problem is that this can't be used on a UFS1 partition
which has just 8K reserved..
-- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jung-uk Kim: "Bigger boot block size?"
- In reply to: Jung-uk Kim: "Bigger boot block size?"
- Next in thread: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Reply: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]