Re: Bigger boot block size?
From: Jung-uk Kim (jkim_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/09/05
- Previous message: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- In reply to: Peter Wemm: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 12:14:37 -0400
On Thursday 08 September 2005 07:52 pm, Peter Wemm wrote:
> On Thursday 08 September 2005 11:18 am, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > I have been working on boot2 recently. I faced constant problem
> > with boot2 size limitation. Can we have bigger boot block size
> > (aka BBSIZE)? In the future, we may have to support different
> > file system to boot from and we won't have any space to add the
> > support without dropping UFS1 support. In fact, I am using
> > 32-sector boot block and I don't see any problem so far. The
> > patch that I've been using is attached.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Jung-uk Kim
>
> Well, the obvious problem is that this can't be used on a UFS1
> partition which has just 8K reserved..
Sigh... But bsdlabel(8) should be able to handle this case when '-B'
option is given and first partition of the slice is UFS1, i. e., we
keep 'historical' boot1/boot2 for a while and drop the support
later. ;-)
Jung-uk Kim
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Jung-uk Kim: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- In reply to: Peter Wemm: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Next in thread: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Reply: Poul-Henning Kamp: "Re: Bigger boot block size?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|