Re: [CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete"

From: Ceri Davies (ceri_at_submonkey.net)
Date: 09/23/05

  • Next message: Massimo Lusetti: "Re: [CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete"" 
    Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:16:23 +0100
To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>

    On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:12:48PM +0200, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
    > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:10:15PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
    > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:05:41PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
    > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:01:41PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote:
    > > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 03:56:49PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
    > > > > > Any objections?
    > > > >
    > > > > Any benefit? What's the rationale?
    > > >
    > > > Convenience.
    > >
    > > I don't get it, though. I have FreeBSD, Solaris and Digital UNIX systems
    > > here and none of them support "del". What does?
    >
    > eg Linux.

    Aha. Well it isn't going to kill me either way, and if it does make
    life easier that's fair enough, but the old *** in me wants people to
    read manuals before they go typing in administrative commands ;)

    Ceri 

    -- 
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm
not sure about the former.			  -- Einstein (attrib.)

  • Next message: Massimo Lusetti: "Re: [CFR] Introduce "route del" as a synonym to "route delete""
    • Quantcast