Re: [REVIEW/TEST] polling(4) changes
From: Gleb Smirnoff (glebius_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 09/30/05
- Previous message: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: [REVIEW/TEST] polling(4) changes"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [REVIEW/TEST] polling(4) changes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 01:17:16 +0400 To: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.org>
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:29:43PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote:
A> > It adds a stub function call every tick. The function returns almost
A> > immediately if no interfaces do polling.
A>
A> If it does a FOREACH(interface) then it should stay as a kernel option.
It isn't. Just 'if (poll_handlers == 0) return;'.
Anyway, deoptionalizing polling would be a separate commit and
discussion.
-- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Luigi Rizzo: "Re: [REVIEW/TEST] polling(4) changes"
- In reply to: Andre Oppermann: "Re: [REVIEW/TEST] polling(4) changes"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|