Re: KTR changes

From: John Baldwin (jhb_at_FreeBSD.org)
Date: 11/01/05

  • Next message: Frank Mayhar: "Re: KTR changes"
    Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:23:45 -0500
    To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
    
    

    On Oct 31, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Nate Lawson wrote:
    > KTR_WITNESS 10

    This is isolated to one file and should probably be aliased
    to some other bit kind of like how I made KTR_TULIP map to
    KTR_DEV when it was enabled and 0 otherwise based on #ifdef's
    in if_de.c. We might should have one generic bit for
    subsystems to use similar to how device drivers can use
    KTR_DEV.

    > As such, I'd like to mark the following unused and free for
    > allocation:
    > KTR_NET, KTR_FS, KTR_MALLOC, KTR_KGDB, KTR_IO

    I'd rather someone add KTR_MALLOC traces than get rid of
    it. :) If we fleshed out our more general logging for
    in-kernel facilities that helps to get a general feel of what
    the system is doing when debugging. I think some traces are
    for debugging specific subsystems such as KTR_WITNESS or
    KTR_TULIP where as some are more general to tell you what the
    kernel is doing (KTR_PROC, KTR_INTR, and KTR_LOCK fall into
    this category as probably would KTR_MALLOC and KTR_CONTENTION).
    I think subsystem trace classes should be mapped to generic
    bits where as kernel-wide tracing should get their own bits if
    possible.

    > These should be merged the following under KTR_MALLOC (KTR_MEM?):
    > KTR_UMA: uma_zalloc_arg, uma_zfree_arg
    > KTR_VM: vmspace_alloc, vmspace_free, vm_map_create,
    > vm_map_entry_unlink

    Well, I'm not sure about those as the KTR_VM ones aren't related
    to kernel malloc at all. vmspaces are the user virtual address
    mappings with vm_map being individual mappings. :) That's like
    saying that mmap() should be part of malloc(). :) I also think
    KTR_UMA is probably useful for getting a general feel for memory
    allocation activity in the kernel.
    > Merge under KTR_SYNCH (KTR_LOCK?):
    > KTR_CRITICAL: critical enter/exit
    > KTR_CONTENTION: mutex contention start/end

    Perhaps default KTR_CRITICAL to off and let people who want it
    map it to a generic bit. It's very expensive and I'm not sure
    it's very useful for all but a few people. Then I would leave
    KTR_CONTENTION alone.

    > Merge under KTR_TIMER:
    > KTR_CLK: hard clock firing

    KTR_CLK is useless, just drop it. Instead, maybe add KTR_INTR
    traces for clock interrupts where they are missing.

    > KTR_CALLOUT: Giant or mutex-based callout run

    Then you can leave KTR_CALLOUT as is. :)

    > Also, it appears that we overran into KTR_CTx space with KTR_UMA
    > (rwatson). Is this something that needs to be changed or should we
    > reduce KTR_CTx?

    I don't think anyone uses KTR_CTx currently?

    > Last, I'd like to add a new level, KTR_POWER, for use with power
    > management events. Since we only have 32 bits of KTR levels, it's
    > important to use them carefully. Comments on all this are welcome.

    Is this for debugging stuff inside ACPI or is it supposed to record
    general system-wide activity?

    Another option is to dispense with the whole bitmask idea altogether
    and give each compiled in KTR class its own boolean char with an
    associoted sysctl and loader tunable. You could then allow users to
    specify each class they want to compile in via a separate kernel
    option (KTR_CLASS_FOO) with a special case that KTR_CLASS_ALL would
    #define all of the classes in sys/ktr.h.

    -- 
    John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
    "Power Users Use the Power to Serve"  =  http://www.FreeBSD.org
    _______________________________________________
    freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
    http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
    To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
    

  • Next message: Frank Mayhar: "Re: KTR changes"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: KTR changes
      ... > the system is doing when debugging. ... I think some traces are ... > allocation activity in the kernel. ... System-wide power activity. ...
      (freebsd-arch)
    • Re: [RFC/PATCH] Documentation of kernel messages
      ... On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 11:51:51 PDT, Randy Dunlap wrote: ... And "for debugging" doesn't cut it IMO. ... people doing support can annotate the messages with real life experience on ... Providing a means for getting localized kernel ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Two FC7 questions
      ... or to never remove an old kernel. ... display for the motor home. ... map so the direction your moving is up, ... I have used roadnav with a smaller display when when using a GPS, ...
      (Fedora)
    • Re: [crash] Re: Latest brk patchset
      ... leaves the space under the kernel avaliable for allocating pagetable ... make sure we map enough to fit linear map pagetables ... that mm/init.c can allocate space from the e820 allocator ... for the linear map of low memory. ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • RE: VMWare Workstation 6 for debugging Linux Kernel (!)
      ... maybe somebody make some side by side comparison of vmware & uml regarding kernel debugging. ... Run gdb on the Host, reference it to the kernel with symbols and attach to ...
      (Linux-Kernel)