Re: KTR changes

From: Nate Lawson (nate_at_root.org)
Date: 11/01/05

  • Next message: John Baldwin: "Re: KTR changes" 
    Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2005 12:26:15 -0800
To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>

    Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
    > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:24:27PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
    > N> As such, I'd like to mark the following unused and free for allocation:
    > N> KTR_NET, KTR_FS, KTR_MALLOC, KTR_KGDB, KTR_IO
    >
    > Please don't touch KTR_NET. Network stack is a big subsystem that should
    > make a use of ktr(4) someday. I use KTR_NET in my testing patches, when
    > I work on chasing bugs. May be I will eventually commit parts of them.

    Ok, I'll leave that one. However, I'm very unsympathetic to the general
    argument of "leave that for the future" when it's been unused since
    version 1.1 in 2000. It looks like I'll be able to reclaim enough to
    leave this one. 

    -- 
Nate
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: John Baldwin: "Re: KTR changes"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: KTR changes
      ... I'd like to mark the following unused and free for allocation: ... Network stack is a big subsystem that should ...
      (freebsd-arch)
    • Re: Panic in bpf, maybe related to if_xl
      ... > It looks like if_xl is not properly acquiring Giant when entering the ... > network stack when running with debug.mpsafenet=0. ... It should be calling ... Gleb Smirnoff provided me with this patch which I am testing now. ...
      (freebsd-current)
    • Re: ng_ksocket & WITNESS
      ... On Sun, 4 Jul 2004, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: ... Could you tell us a bit about the network stack configuration ... > Totus tuus, Glebius. ...
      (freebsd-current)