Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] kqueue'ify inetd(8) and several other cleanups

From: John-Mark Gurney (gurney_j_at_resnet.uoregon.edu)
Date: 11/10/05

  • Next message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] kqueue'ify inetd(8) and several other cleanups" 
    Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:48:49 -0800
To: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>

    Maxim Konovalov wrote this message on Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 17:27 +0300:
    > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, 11:43+0800, Xin LI wrote:
    >
    > > Dear folks,
    > >
    > > Here is a patchset that taught inetd(8) about kqueue, and some other
    > > cleanups that raises WARNS level from 2 to 3, etc.
    > >
    > > http://people.freebsd.org/~delphij/for_review/patch-inetd-kqueue
    > >
    > > The kqueue part was a continuation of jmg@'s patchset.
    >
    > Can I ask: why?

    Or to ask a different question, why continue to use select? When I
    originally did the patch for inetd, I was VERY surprised at how little
    of the logic I had to change to make it use kqueue...

    Part of the reason I never committed it was that I did most of my work
    on 3.x at the time, and I had serious tcp connection rate issues with
    4.x (-current) at the time, and people wanted benchmarks, but w/ 4.x,
    I couldn't get more than a hundred connections per second, while my
    3.x box could do thousands... 

    -- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579
     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
  • Next message: Bruce M Simpson: "Re: [PATCH FOR REVIEW] kqueue'ify inetd(8) and several other cleanups"

    Relevant Pages