Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?
From: Daniel Eischen (deischen_at_freebsd.org)
Date: 11/13/05
- Previous message: Xin LI: "RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- In reply to: Xin LI: "RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:46:09 -0500 (EST) To: delphij@delphij.net
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Xin LI wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any reason that we have sys/i386 and not sys/arch/i386? I
> think the latter is a lot cleaner (and libpthread, etc. already has
> their arch/[arch] directory on the other hand).
FreeBSD started out as 386 only. It probably just wasn't envisioned
that we'd have more than just one or two archs.
I think this issue has been brought up in the past, and if it causes
a lot of pain or repo-bloat, they'll probably be some resistance.
-- DE _______________________________________________ freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
- Previous message: Xin LI: "RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- In reply to: Xin LI: "RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Next in thread: Bruce Evans: "Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Reply: Bruce Evans: "Re: RFC: Why not move kernel MD code to sys/arch/?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
