Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:08:04 +0100
In message <20060126162032.A16564@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marius Strobl writes:
>One other thing that might cause problems regarding your work is
>that the tick counters are not in sync across the CPUs of a MP
>system.
Yes, this is outstanding, see my discussion with jhb about this.
Synchronizing the counters will not be necessary.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Marius Strobl
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by Date: Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe
- Previous by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by thread: RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Index(es):