Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:43:40 +0100
In message <200601270232.12528.Thomas.Sparrevohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Sparre
vohn writes:
>On Thursday 26 January 2006 06:06, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
>>
>> I wonder how many people still bill for CPU time? I'd go for the
>> faster context switches.
>>
>
>Almost all major ITO's providers - From SUN, HP, IBM, EDS etc. has offerings
>that in some shape or other uses a "Utility model" based upon some sort of
>financial model based upon actual CPU/IO etc. usage - It is a major area now
>and provides one of the corner stones in the movement towards "Public Utility
>models"
Should we also add that all these initiatives are spectacular commercial
failures because users hate to buy rubberband by the inch ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Thomas Sparrevohn
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- References:
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Thomas Sparrevohn
- Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|