RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: "Mullen, Adam" <Adam.Mullen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 12:39:44 -0600
Lets see here though, how many of us have a 100 node beowulf cluster who
use FreeBSD daily? I know I don't! I've been following this
conversation and my 2 cents are this, taking into consideration cpu time
accounting for machines that use power management is trivial. I view
those that use power management are a lot less likely to be in an
environment where they are either A) billing for utility computing, B)
care about 99.9999% accurate cpu time accounting, C) have a need for
this precision. My thought is that a blurb be submitted with this patch
specifying the caveats if powersaved is also used. Just my humble
opinion.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Garance A Drosihn
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:30 PM
To: Mike Jakubik
Cc: arch@xxxxxxxxxxx; current@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
At 4:03 AM -0500 1/27/06, Mike Jakubik wrote:
>
>Let's not forget, FreeBSD is really a server OS. Who in their right
>mind uses power saving features on a server? It sounds nice in theory,
>but doesn't work as well.
Apparently your power and cooling bills are much lower than ours.
We would very much love it if the computers will use only the energy
they need to get the job done. Yes, that means a big bill when some
simulation is running on a 100-node beowulf cluster. But it also means
we don't want to be paying the bill to run that cluster at full-throttle
when there's no work for those CPU's to do.
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@xxxxxxxxxxx
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee
you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this
e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secured or error-free as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, received late or incomplete, or could contain viruses. The sender therefore
does not accept liability for any error or omission in the contents of this message, which arises as a result of e-mail transmission.
If verification is required, please request a hard-copy version from the sender.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Garance A Drosihn
- RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- From: Frank Mayhar
- RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Prev by Date: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by Date: RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Previous by thread: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Next by thread: RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
- Index(es):