Re: NTFS write support
- From: Scott Long <scottl@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:25:47 -0700
Max Khon wrote:
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 09:18:35AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
I think ntfsprogs (in the ports tree) does everything in userland, and they
claim to have stable write support. The homepage is here:
http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
They also have some documentation there.
They also have some docs. Not very readable but seems to have
quite a few details. Time to do some reading.
My opinion is that from-scratch implementation is not possible within
reasonable period of time. I'd suggest to try to port captive ntfs + fuse
framework or (oh my! I did not tell you that) extend ndisulator so that it
is possible to load ntfs.sys directly into the kernel.
/fjoe
Filesystems are one of those things that are very, very, very tightly
coupled with the virtual memory system. They are basically the center
of the universe for Unix-like kernels. Anyone who succeeds at making
a shim layer for NT filesystem modules likely has a very exciting career
ahead of them in turning lead to gold, developing perpetual motion machines, and solving world peace (yummmm.... whirled peas.....)
=-D
Scott
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- From: Sergey Babkin
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- From: Max Khon
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- Prev by Date: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
- Next by Date: Re: NTFS write support
- Previous by thread: Re: Re: NTFS write support
- Next by thread: Re: Re: NTFS write support
- Index(es):