Re: [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- From: Gilbert Fernandes <gilbert.fernandes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 21:14:28 +0100
First of all, everything that you quoted from Slashdot is rubbish.
I did say it was a Slashdot comment. The word "Slashdot" itself means a lot
but adding "comment" to it clearly explains how this information is to be
considered :o)
The point was more broad than the comment itself, though.
Apple is curently using the FreeBSD ntfs driver to mount NTFS partitions.
--
unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; find ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ;
fsck ; umount ; sleep
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- From: Sergey Babkin
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- From: Max Khon
- [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- From: Gilbert Fernandes
- Re: [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- From: Scott Long
- Re: Re: NTFS write support
- Prev by Date: Re: [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- Next by Date: Optimized kernel copying functions
- Previous by thread: Re: [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- Next by thread: Jordan, can you please comment? Re: [off-topic] NTFS, Apple and GPL vs LGPL (Was : NTFS write support)
- Index(es):