Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:48:25 +0100
In message <20060314184157.V10576@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christian Kratzer writes:
IMHO, Open{BGP,OSPF}D belong in src/contrib, not in ports/net.
please don't bloat the base system with something that can run
equally well from ports.
I would tend to agree.
90% or more of all FreeBSD systems will not run either of these routing
daemons, so their rightful place is in ports.
Also, considering the general hazzleness of src/contrib I think ports
offer a far more flexible infrastructure for dealing with the software
(such as openospfd-stable vs openospfd-cvs versions etc.)
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- From: Florent Thoumie
- Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- References:
- Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- From: Christian Kratzer
- Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- Next by Date: netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found
- Previous by thread: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- Next by thread: Re: Import src/sys/sys/hash.h from OpenBSD/NetBSD
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|