Re: [CFR] Upgrading base version of our resolver in libc to BIND9
- From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:43:34 +0900
Hi,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 02:08:50 +0900
Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@xxxxxxxxxxx> said:
ume> I wish to upgrade the base version of our resolver in libc to BIND9's
ume> one.
I updated the patches:
- merged our local changes more.
- defined some IPv6 related definitions.
- thread-safeness for mtctxres which is used from res_debug.
- upgraded the base version of inet_*(3) to BIND9's one as well.
- re-made the patch against latest HEAD.
The patches are:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/FreeBSD/libc-bind9-7c-20060317.diff.gz
(for HEAD as of today)
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/FreeBSD/libc-bind9-6s-20060317.diff.gz
(for RELENG_6 as of today)
You need to remove some obsolete files. Please refer the instruction
written in the head of the patch.
Sincerely,
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@xxxxxxxxxxxx ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- References:
- [CFR] Upgrading base version of our resolver in libc to BIND9
- From: Hajimu UMEMOTO
- [CFR] Upgrading base version of our resolver in libc to BIND9
- Prev by Date: Re: KAME/Fast IPSEC (was Re: netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found)
- Next by Date: Proposed addition of malloc_size_np()
- Previous by thread: Re: [CFR] Upgrading base version of our resolver in libc to BIND9
- Next by thread: netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
