Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:07:11 +0200
In message <4478F767.5090403@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Doug Barton writes:
At first glance I don't see anything wrong with that logic. My one request
is that you add a branch that says, "if legacy behavior is requested by
<some configuration method>, add it to the mix."
Legacy behaviour is exactly what we need to avoid to get the
device locking sorted out, so this would be rather poisonous
to the entire effort.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@xxxxxxxxxxx | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- References:
- Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- From: Doug Barton
- Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- Prev by Date: Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- Next by Date: Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- Previous by thread: Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- Next by thread: Re: A sort of plan for consoles in FreeBSD
- Index(es):