Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds
- From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 09:15:56 -0600 (MDT)
In message: <28872.1151526546@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
: In message <20060628150227.R75801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Andrew R. Reiter" writes
: :
: >
: >I apologize for top posting, but I lost the email that I think my
: >point/question pertains to.
: >
: >Part of this seems to be for compatibility / merging from drivers of other
: >OSes, no? If I am wrong, ignore me :-). If this is the case, would it be
: >better to create some common other area for things of this nature so that
: >it suffices to allow builds, but does not infect other areas of our own
: >code base?
:
: That's what I proposed too: #include <sys/netbsd_compat.h>
This is even lamer. It makes no sense to invent a stupid place for a
compatibility define. Might as well put the definition of NULL in
limits.h.
I'm killing this idea because people hate it.
Warner
_______________________________________________
freebsd-arch@xxxxxxxxxxx mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx"
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds
- From: Andrew R. Reiter
- Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds
- Prev by Date: Re: Bug#366546: [Debian] login: please move nologin under /bin directory
- Next by Date: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds
- Previous by thread: Re: Bug#366546: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
- Next by thread: Re: SET, CLR, ISSET in types.h for _KERNEL builds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|